Haiper AI Review

Is Haiper AI Worth It? You Can't Use It Anymore

The honest answer to "is Haiper AI worth it" is that there's nothing left to be worth it. The consumer product shut down in February 2025, and there's no way to sign up, generate a video, or pay for a plan today. I checked directly against haiper.ai on 2026-09-02: the site serves a static page with a logo and nothing else, no navigation, no pricing link, no application behind it.

That's a different answer than most published reviews of Haiper give. Videoinu, Media.io, and freevideogenerator.io all describe Haiper as a live, testable text-to-video generator with a working free tier and paid plans. Two of those three carry 2026 dates, well after the shutdown. Only one, Kompozy, gets the central fact right. See below for what that split looks like and what it means for how much to trust any specific claim about "trying" Haiper today.

What Happened to Haiper AI

Haiper was a credible product before it shut down. Founded in 2021 in London by Yishu Miao and Ziyu Wang, both former Google DeepMind researchers, it came out of stealth in March 2024 with a $13.8 million seed round led by Octopus Ventures. Its strongest release, Haiper 2.0, launched on 28 October 2024 with templates, an HD upscaler, keyframe conditioning, and roughly six-second clips, and drew real "watch out, OpenAI" coverage for its realism and motion at the time.

Four months later, the company shut down its consumer video business in February 2025, without warning. In March 2025, cofounders Miao and Wang, along with ML researcher Edward Hayes, joined Microsoft AI to work on multimodal generative systems, reported as a talent hire rather than a company purchase, not a Microsoft buyout of Haiper itself. By mid-2025, Haiper's video models had been sold to NetMind.AI, a decentralized AI-compute company, which folded them into its enterprise inference platform. The model survives there, for businesses integrating inference at scale, not for an individual creator who wants to generate a clip.

What Haiper AI Was Actually Good At (While It Was Live)

Haiper's core value while it was live was speed and simplicity: type a prompt or upload a still image, and generate a short clip without a timeline editor. In my testing it covered text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video restyling, and keyframe conditioning for guiding motion between two visual states.

Image-to-video was the mode I found most reliable. A clear starting image gave the model a stronger anchor than text alone, and simple motion, a subject stepping out of frame, a soft camera drift, looked fluid on straightforward subjects. Complex prompts, dense multi-clause instructions, and close human interactions were the weak points I ran into, alongside a hard clip-length cap that made it unsuitable for anything beyond a short motion sketch.

Most Reviews of Haiper Still Describe It as Live

Most of what's published about Haiper AI right now describes a product that doesn't exist anymore. Videoinu gives a full pricing breakdown (a free plan, a monthly plan "around $10–$15," an annual plan "around $100–$140") with no indication the platform is unavailable. Media.io, whose own footer states it reviewed pricing on 2026-08-06, describes credit-based generation costs "based on official Haiper product, documentation, and pricing information available at the time reviewed" (eighteen months after the shutdown) with no note that the product can no longer be signed up for. freevideogenerator.io narrates specific tests, like a "dog walk-out" image-to-video attempt, in language that reads as a live, current account despite its "Updated 2026" stamp.

None of that necessarily means those sources are being dishonest. The tests they describe most likely happened before February 2025 and were never revisited once the product closed. But it does mean a review's stated update date isn't proof its content was checked against current reality, and multiple 2026-dated sources make the same mistake.

What to Use Instead

For talking-head or avatar-specific video from a script, Kompozy's own comparison calls HeyGen "the category leader and still very much live." This site's own HeyGen Review covers it in depth.

For a like-for-like replacement, prompt in, short clip out, a current generative video model is the direct swap. This site's own Kling AI Review and Google Veo 3 Review both cover models competing in the category Haiper occupied before it closed.

The broader lesson here goes beyond which tool replaces it: a workflow built around one single-model vendor carries real shutdown risk, as this case shows. Diversifying which tools a routine depends on matters beyond this one case.

Where This Fits in the Wider AI Video Toolkit

This review sits inside the AI Video Tools section. For avatar-specific video, see HeyGen Review. For a direct prompt-to-clip replacement, see Kling AI Review and Google Veo 3 Review. For a wider comparison across the category, see The Best AI Video Generators, Compared.

Frequently asked questions

What is Haiper AI?

A discontinued AI video generation platform. It turned text prompts or still images into short clips, and was live from its 2024 launch until its consumer app shut down in February 2025. The underlying model now exists only inside NetMind.AI's enterprise inference platform.

Can I still use Haiper AI?

No, not as an individual creator. I checked directly: haiper.ai serves a static page with no working application. The model is accessible only through NetMind.AI's enterprise API, which isn't a consumer sign-up.

What happened to Haiper AI?

It shut down its consumer video business in February 2025. Its cofounders joined Microsoft AI the following month, reported as a talent hire rather than an acquisition, and its video models were sold to NetMind.AI by mid-2025.

Which AI content generator is best?

Depends on the job. For avatar-led video specifically, see HeyGen Review. For general prompt-to-clip generation, see Kling AI Review and Google Veo 3 Review, or the full Best AI Video Generators, Compared.